Manila,
Philippines – The recent move of President Rodrigo Duterte from the
International Criminal Court (ICC) is a logical reason, says a political
analyst.
Given that,
the president obviously believes that the court is being used by his detractors
who wants him out.
According
to Ramon Casiple, the executive director of the Institute for Political and Electoral
Reform, the withdrawal from ICC was merely a reaction to the actions of the president’s
detractors, who are using human rights issues as ground for ouster.
“It is
going to that direction, a destabilization campaign leading to his ouster, and
if that will be the case then the frame of mind of the President is to stop it
because he has the mandate,” Casiple explained in an interview.
He added
that those who filed for charges at the ICC against the president were of
course, connected to the opposition camp, referring to the communication filed
by lawyer Jude Sabio and also the supplemental complaint made possible by
Senator Antonio Trillanes and Rep. Gary Alejano.
These petitioners
accused the president of mass murder over his bloody war against illegal drugs.
Furthermore,
they escalated the case without even exhausting all available legal means in
the country, Casiple added.
Casiple mentioned
that the president might have thought that some countries may be involved in
the propaganda against him. Thus, with all these reasons, what the president did
was logical.
“Given that
context, the President’s decision was logical,” he said.
The political
analyst further explained that withdrawing from ICC cannot be taken against the
Philippines as United States and some countries, were not even a party to the Rome
Statue.
“The
problem of ICC is that many are questioning why the court seems to only go
after third world countries,” he added, inciting the issues that surround the
ICC.
Casiple
conclude that the President’s decision will unlikely get a negative impact on
foreign investors – as they do not care about political issues for as long as
the country has good economic policy.
0 Comments